top of page

Conflict in Healthcare: Isn't it Time We Talk About the Elephant in the Room?

  • Writer: Kimberly Best
    Kimberly Best
  • Mar 8, 2024
  • 3 min read

Updated: Oct 29

I've spent over a decade mediating healthcare conflicts, and I've noticed something troubling: many organizations operate as if ignoring conflict will make it disappear. Others acknowledge the problems but don't believe anything can actually fix them. "That's just how it is in healthcare," they tell me. "People are stressed. Turnover is inevitable."

It doesn't have to be that way.


The Cost of Denial



Elephant sitting between two people in an office

Yet when I suggest implementing conflict management systems, I often hear: "We don't really have a conflict problem" or "Our people just need to be more professional" or "We've tried teambuilding exercises - they don't work."


This is the elephant in the room: the widespread belief that either conflicts don't exist (they do), or that nothing can truly address them (tools exist and they work).


What I've Learned from the Frontlines

In my work with healthcare organizations, I've seen the real damage of unaddressed conflict:

  • The ICU where complete staff turnover happened in 18 months because no one intervened in toxic leadership dynamics

  • The clinic where physicians stopped communicating directly, routing everything through administrators to avoid confrontation

  • The nursing unit where gossip and cliques made new hires feel so unwelcome that most left within 90 days

  • The leadership team that couldn't make decisions because underlying resentments hijacked every meeting


These weren't "personality conflicts" or "just stress." These were skills gaps - organizational systems that lacked the infrastructure to handle normal workplace disagreements before they became relationship-ending crises.


The Tools Exist - Organizations Just Need to Use Them


Here's what many healthcare leaders don't realize: conflict management isn't about preventing disagreement (impossible) or forcing people to "get along" (ineffective). It's about building systems that allow teams to navigate inevitable tensions constructively.

Effective conflict management systems include:


Early intervention mechanisms - Ways to address concerns when they're still small, before positions harden and relationships fracture. This might be peer mediation, conflict coaching, or simply teaching teams to have direct conversations earlier.

Clear escalation pathways - Staff need to know what to do when direct conversation doesn't work. Not knowing where to turn for help leaves people stuck between suffering in silence or explosive confrontation.

Skills training across all levels - From front-line staff learning to give feedback respectfully to executives understanding how their communication style impacts team dynamics. These aren't soft skills; they're essential professional competencies.

Leadership accountability - The strongest conflict management policies fail if leaders model poor conflict behavior. When executives avoid difficult conversations, make decisions without input, or allow certain people to behave badly without consequences, no system can compensate.

Regular system evaluation - Conflict patterns reveal organizational problems. The recurring scheduling disputes might signal understaffing. The tension between departments might stem from unclear role boundaries. Treating symptoms without addressing root causes keeps organizations stuck.


The Payoff Is Real and Measurable


I've watched organizations transform when they commit to proactive conflict management:

  • Retention improves because people feel heard and supported, not trapped in unbearable situations

  • Communication strengthens as teams develop shared language and frameworks for difficult conversations

  • Innovation increases because diverse perspectives can surface and be integrated rather than suppressed or dismissed

  • Patient care improves when healthcare teams spend energy on care delivery instead of navigating interpersonal minefields

  • Stress decreases not because the work becomes easier, but because people have tools to handle the interpersonal challenges alongside the clinical ones


This requires commitment at all levels - from executives modeling constructive conflict behavior to front-line staff learning to speak up earlier. But the investment pays dividends that compound over time.


Shifting the Narrative


Let's shift our perspective on conflict within healthcare from being a dreaded inevitability to an opportunity for organizational growth. The question isn't whether conflicts will arise - they absolutely will. The question is whether your organization will continue pretending they don't exist, accepting them as unfixable, or finally building the systems to address them constructively.


I've seen too many talented healthcare professionals leave positions they loved because the relational environment became intolerable. I've watched too many organizations lose institutional knowledge and team cohesion because they believed nothing could change.


The elephant in the room isn't just that healthcare has conflict. It's that we have effective tools to manage it, yet many organizations still choose denial or resignation over action.


Your staff knows the elephant is there. They're living with it every day. The only question is whether leadership is finally ready to acknowledge it and do something about it.

It doesn't have to be this way. And honestly, given the current healthcare workforce crisis, can we really afford for it to continue?

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page